/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) cognitive science (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

---

1) Candidate: cognitive science

Is in goldstandard

Evaluando al candidato cognitive science:

cognitive science
Lengua:
Frec: 86
Docs: 53
Nombre propio: / 86 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.134 = ( + (1+0) / (1+6.44294349584873)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

cognitive science

: Abbot-Smith, K. & Behrens, H. (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The german passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 995-1026 [en línea]. Disponible en: [91]https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_61 : Anderson, J., Conrad, F. & Corbett, A. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-505. : Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286-309. : Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends Cognitive Science, 4(11), 417-423. : Bangerter, A. & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195-225. : Bara, B. & Tirassa, M. (1999). A mentalist framework for linguistic and extralinguistic communication. Ponencia presentada en Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Cognitive Science (ECCS´99). Certosa di Pontagnio, Siena, Italia. : Bara, B., Bosco, F. & Bucarelli, M. (1999). Simple and complex speech acts: What makes the difference within a developmental perspective. En M. Hahn & S. Stones (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXI Cognitive Science Society (pp. 55-60). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Brennan, S. E. & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner‐specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 274-291. : Carlucci, L. & Case, J. (2013). On the necessity of U-shaped learning. Topics in cognitive Science, 5(1), 56-88. : Chi, M. Bassok, & Lewis, M. (1989). Self-Explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 15, 145-182. : Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477. : Chi, M., Bassok, M. & Lewis, M. (1989). Selfexplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 15, 145-182. : Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. : Chi, M., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T. & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533. : Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32 ^nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 984-989). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. : De Deyne, S., Peirsman, Y. & Storms, G. (2009). Sources of semantic similarity. Ponencia presentada en el 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1834-1839). Amsterdam: Netherlands. : Dronkers, N. (1999) Language, Neural Basis of. En R.A. Wilson & F.C.Keil (Eds), The MIT encyclopedia of the Cognitive Science. 448-451. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Durbin, M., Earwood, J. & Golden, R. (2000). Hidden Markov models for coding story recall data. En Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 113-118). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Dwyer, S., Huebner, B. & Hauser, M. D. (2010). The linguistic analogy: Motivations, results, and speculations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 486-510. : Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211. : Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187. : Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press. : Fox, B. (1986). Cognitive and interactional aspects of correction in tutoring. Technical Report 88-2, Institute of Cognitive Science, Universidad de Colorado, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. : Fuhrman, O. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit non-linguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430-1451. : Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 92-96. : Golden, R. M. & Goldman, S. R. (2006). An empirical feasibility study of the ARCADE system. En R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp.1376-1381). Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. : Haddock, N. J., Klein, E. & Morrill, G. (1987). Categorial Grammar, Unification Grammar, and Parsing. Technical Report No. EUCCS/WP-1. Centre for Cognitive Science, Edimburgo: Universidad de Edimburgo. : Hale, J. T. (2011). What a rational parser would do. Cognitive Science, 35, 399-443. : Hobbs, J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive science, 3(1), 67-90. : Holmes, K. J. & Wolff, P. (2010). Simulation from schematics: Dorsal stream processing and the perception of implied motion. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, Oregon, USA. : Jezek, E. & Melloni, C. (2011). Nominals, polysemy, and co-predication. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 1-31. : Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Londres: MIT Press. : Kintsch, W. (2001) Predication. Cognitive Science. 25, 173202. : Krause-Ono, M. (2004). Change in backchanneling behaviour. The influence from L2 to L1 on the use of backchannel cues. Journal of Cognitive Science. Muroran Cognitive Science Circle, 3, 51-81. : Lee, H. S. & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Causal models guide analogical inference. En D. McNamara & D. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1205-1210). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society. : Martinovski, B., Mao, W., Gratch, J. & Marsella, S. (2005). Mitigation theory: An integrated approach. En Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 27, 1407-1412. : Miikkulainen, M., & Dyer, M. (1991). Natural language processing with modular PDP networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science, 15, 345-399. : Noveck, I. (2018). Experimental pragmatics: The making of a cognitive science. Cambridge University Press. : Núñez, R. & Cornejo, C. (2012). Facing the sunrise: Cultural worldview underlying intrinsic-based encoding of absolute frames of reference in Aymara. Cognitive Science, 1-27. : Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(3), 105-110. : Quesada, J., Kintsch, W. & Gómez, E. (2002). A theory of complex problem solving using latent semantic analysis. En W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Actas de the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 750-755). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Rayner, K., Li, X. & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader Model of Eye Movement Control to chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021-1033. : Recanati. F. (1995). The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science, 19, 207-232. : Reitter, E., Moore, J. & Keller, F. (2006). Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. En Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 685-690. : Richardson, D. & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045-1060. : Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Barsalou, L. & McRaec, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real–time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780. : Rodd, J., Gaskell, G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104. : Romberg, A. R. & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906-914 [en línea]. Disponible en: [120]https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78.Statistical : Rumelhart, D. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. En D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press. : Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). PDP Models and general issues in cognitive science. En D.E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Paralllel distributed processing (Vol.1). Cambridge. MA.: M.I.T. Press, A Bradford Book. : Shah, P. & Freedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top‐down and bottom‐up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 560-578. : Sun, R., Merrill, E. & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 203-244. : Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. : Tenny, C. (1989). The aspectual interface hypothesis.Lexicon Project Working Papers, 31. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science at MIT. : VanLehn, K, Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Jordan, P., Olney, A. & Rose, C. (2005). When is reading just as effective as one-on-one interactive human tutoring? Actas de the Annual Cognitive Science Society. Stressa, Italia. : Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. Massachussets: MIT Press. : West, C. K., Farmer, J. A. & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. : Wiemer-Hastings, P.; Graesser, A. & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (1998). Inferring the meanings of verbs context. En M. Gernsbacher & S. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenieth annual conference of cognitive science (pp.1142-1147). Wisconsin: Erlbaum. : Wolff, P. & Holmes, K. J. (2011). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 253-265. : Wolff, P. & Zettergren, M. (2002). A vector model of causal meaning. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-forth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 944-949). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. : Zeevat, H., Klein, E. & Calder, J. (1987). Unification categorial grammar. In J. Haddock, E. Klein & G. Morill (Eds.), Categorial grammar, unification grammar and parsing (pp. 195-222). Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science. : Zwaan, R., Madden, C., Yaxley, R. & Aveyard, M. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.